DARWIN’S theory is NOT SCIENCE! In 5 minutes – Dr David Berlinski





“The fundamental claim of intelligent design is straightforward and easily intelligible: namely, there are natural systems that cannot be adequately explained in terms of undirected natural forces and that exhibit features which in any other circumstance we would attribute to intelligence.”
― William A. Dembski, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design

Dr. Dembski has taught at Northwestern University, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Dallas. He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. Dr. Dembski is a graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy. He also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996. He has held National Science Foundation graduate and postdoctoral fellowships.

“Ewww… intelligent design people! They’re just buck-toothed, Bible-pushing nincompoops with community-college degrees who’re trying to sell a gussied-up creationism to a cretinous public! No need to address their concerns or respond to their arguments. They are Not Science. They are poopy-heads. There. I just saved you the trouble of reading 90 percent of the responses to the Intelligent Design position… This is how losers act just before they lose: arrogant, self-satisfied, too important to be bothered with substantive refutation, and disdainful of their own faults… The only remaining question is whether Darwinism will exit gracefully, or whether it will go down biting, screaming, censoring, and denouncing to the bitter end.”
― Jonathan Wells, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design

Jonathan Wells has received two Ph.D.s, one in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley, and one in Religious Studies from Yale University.

Be honest. Have you personally examined the evidence about the identity of Jesus Christ and come to a thoughtful conclusion as to what this means to you? Your conclusion has eternal consequences.

Merriam Webster defines:

ex·am·ine (noun)
: the act of looking at something closely and carefully

ev·i·dence (noun)
: something which shows that something else exists or is true

con·clu·sion (noun)
: a final decision or judgment : an opinion or decision that is formed after a period of thought or research

truth (noun)
: the state of being the case, fact : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality, a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality

in·tel·lec·tu·al (adjective)
: of or relating to the ability to think in a logical way
: involving serious study and thought

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s